Sunday, December 18, 2011

Magnesita's 3Q11 Cash from Operations = deception

Take a look at this shit: Release 3Q11

They start the release with this big achievement:

MAGNESITA REGISTRA FLUXO DE CAIXA OPERACIONAL DE
R$ 461 MILHÕES, RECORDE NO ACUMULADO DO ANO, E LUCRO
LÍQUIDO 12% SUPERIOR AO DO 2T11

Let's see the 2011 acumulated Cash Flow Statement at page 21.

It starts with net earnings and add some adjustments, as usual.
Then things start to get interesting:

1) They added 63.116 of judicial litigation received - that's ok for a cash flow statement, but doesn't justify all the cheers about the CFO, because it's NONRECURRENT.
2) They added more 48.883 of asset sales - shouldn't this be cash from investiments? This is obviously NONRECURRENT and probably NONOPERATIONAL
3) They added 119.321 of the increase in accounts payable (Fornecedores e empreiteiros). This is also NONRECURRENT.

Subtracting all those NONRECURRENTS the CFO would be only 229,68 millions. It's just a 50% difference from the headline!
I looked for any comments about the CFO but they just cheered about their great accomplishment.

Under no circumstances does any article or opinion posted on this blog represents any kind of advice, suggestion or recommendation to buy or sell any security. We also do not guarantee the accuracy of any information contained in any posting on this blog.

Related Posts

3 comments:

sid said...

I fully agree. Besides of what you've commented, they also added back 132 mi of charges and monetary/exchange variations. Part of that amount is interest not paid, but that is cleary an expense that will have to be paid soon.
So I beleive cash flow is, for 9M11, earnings (87) + depreciation (77) - lawsuit (63) - asset sale (49) = 52.
Yes, a shit.

sid said...

By the way, one final word:
Magnesita is another heavy bet of Fama that I don't like.
But Fama is down -19%, Orbe is down -21.5% and I'm getting +15.6% so far this year.
So it does pays to be contrarian on them.

sid said...

In fact, adding back 30 mi of exchange variations and taking just 35 mi for suppliers gain (120 mi is clearly not sustainable), I get a net cash provided from operating activities of 160 mi in 2011 (annualized 9M11/3*4). That is rough 10% of current market value.
Of course, we have to deduct investments, then FCF would be about 100 mi (6%).
I prefer to invest in GGBR/CSNA instead.

Post a Comment

We encourage your feedback and we will take your comments into serious consideration. However, you must be warned that any comment that does not follow the blog philosophy (Value Investing and Behavioural Finance) will be promptly removed.